Natalija Senic vs Giulia Safina Popa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Sep at 10:51 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Senic vs G. Safina Popa

SRB
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Senic 1 - 0 Popa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Natalija Senic winning 2 and Giulia Safina Popa winning 0. The last match between Natalija Senic and Giulia Safina Popa was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 14-09-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Natalija Senic getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Senic | 1 |
Popa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W15 Kursumlijska Banja(09-14-25)
N. Senic vs G. S. Popa H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $2,585 |
72.18% (179-69) | Career Total W/L | 65.91% (29-15) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
7 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
100.00% (1-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
N. Senic vs G. S. Popa Match Preview:
- When examining second serve performance over the last six months, Senic has a slight advantage, winning 35.3% of points compared to Popa’s 34.39%.
- Looking at return game statistics, Popa excels, having won 56% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form, outdoing Senic, who stands at 51.35%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Popa again leads with 32.65% compared to Senic’s 29.87%.
- Under pressure, Senic seems stronger at saving breakpoints, with a 38.7% save rate versus Popa’s 37.4%.
- Analyzing overall performance, Senic shows a higher win rate over the past year at 73.21%, while Popa has a win rate of 65.22%.
- Both players perform best on Clay, with Senic having a slightly better career win percentage on this surface at 73% compared to Popa’s 70%.
- At the $10K tournament level, Senic proved more dominant, winning 85.71% of matches compared to Popa’s 69.23%.
- Who has faced tougher competition? Popa has, with an average opponent rank of 312.74, better than Senic’s 403.91.
- In deciding sets, Popa has a commanding lead, winning 67% of these encounters, while Senic trails with a 43% success rate.
- Examining breakpoint conversions, both players are nearly even, with Senic at 35.4% and Popa at 34.69%.
Editorial Prediction (September 14, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the metrics, it's clear that Popa holds a slight edge in returning games, crucial for disrupting Senic's serve. With a superior percentage in breaking the opponent's second serve, Popa demonstrates a stronger return game especially when it comes to first serves.
Senic compensates with higher break point saving efficiency and a better overall match win percentage, reflecting a consistent ability to withstand pressure. Yet, Popa's commanding performance in deciding sets could be a game-changer in a closely contested match.
Despite Senic having a marginally higher win rate over the past year, Popa’s experience against tougher opponents and efficiency in deciding sets might give them the upper hand. In conclusion, Popa appears to have a slight edge for victory in this upcoming matchup. However, the match will likely be competitive and could hinge on key moments when each player's strengths come into play.
Natalija Senic vs Giulia Safina Popa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Senic vs G. S. Popa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:12:12 | Average Match Time | 1:12:12 |
65% (11/17) | 1st Serve % | 78% (18/23) |
73% (8/11) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (9/18) |
67% (4/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (1/5) |
67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
57% (13/23) | Return Points Win % | 29% (5/17) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Senic Recent Matches Played
G. S. Popa Recent Matches Played

N. Senic vs G. S. Popa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
72.18% (179/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.91% (29/15) |
70.49% (375/157) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.16% (60/35) |
60.54% (2733/1781) | Games Win/Loss | 56.59% (472/362) |
0.00% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
73.11% (174/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.29% (28/13) |
55.56% (5/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
253 | Aces Total | 25 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.51 |
411 | Total Double Faults | 209 |
1:23:1 | Average Match Time | 1:14:15 |
431.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 281.2 |
60% (7357/12260) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1220/2072) |
62% (4573/7357) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (754/1220) |
49% (2408/4903) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (357/852) |
56% (1044/1865) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (139/290) |
52% (6520/12482) | Return Points Win % | 49% (999/2059) |
100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
60.94% (39/25) | Challenger W/L | 66.67% (8/4) |
75.96% (139/44) | Futures W/L | 65.52% (19/10) |
73% (176/242) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (28/43) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
59% (20/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
53% (21/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
94% (179/168) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (30/28) |
6% (179/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (30/1) |
16% (69/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (14/0) |